Differences Between Hasnat and Sarjis Over Army Issue Hint at Conflict?

Staff Reporter

The chief organizer of the National Citizens’ Party (NCP) and leader of the Baishakhi movement, Hasnat Abdullah, recently posted on Facebook regarding the army, prompting another NCP organizer and Baishakhi leader, Sarjis Alam, to express his disagreement in a separate post.

On March 23, Sunday, Sarjis shared his views on his verified Facebook account, stating that the army did not summon them to the cantonment; rather, they went voluntarily.

In his post, Sarjis wrote that individuals interpret statements differently. He acknowledged that Hasnat had shared his interpretation of the army chief’s remarks on Facebook but noted that he had some differences with that perspective.

Sarjis explained that he and Hasnat had met with the army chief to discuss certain matters. He clarified that they were not summoned to the cantonment but had gone on their own initiative after communicating with the army chief’s military advisor.

Regarding the army chief’s strong remarks on the Pilkhana massacre anniversary, Sarjis mentioned that he had asked the military advisor if they perceived any unwanted developments. The advisor then suggested a direct conversation with the army chief, which led to the meeting.

Sarjis emphasized that he viewed the army chief’s statements as direct opinions rather than formal proposals. He also clarified that the tone of the conversation was straightforward but not extreme, as Hasnat’s post might have suggested.

He further addressed Hasnat’s claim about a heated exchange during the meeting, stating that while the conversation did occur, it was not as confrontational as portrayed. Sarjis also distanced himself from the narrative of pitting the NCP or the public against the army, stating that such a stance was not relevant.

Sarjis expressed his personal opinion that while they could have discussed the matters within their party forum or coordinated with other political parties, publicizing the details on Facebook might undermine trust in future discussions with stakeholders.

He concluded by reaffirming his commitment to the movement and the cause, stating that their fight against any version of the Awami League’s return to power would continue. He also highlighted the importance of self-criticism and maintaining their moral compass.

Earlier, on Friday, March 21, Hasnat Abdullah had posted about a alleged conspiracy involving a “refined Awami League,” which sparked widespread discussion. His post, which criticized the army, drew backlash from intellectuals both at home and abroad.