Asif Nazrul Under Fire Despite Tireless Efforts, Defends Himself in Facebook Post

Staff Correspondent

Dhaka, May 9, 2025: Dr. Asif Nazrul, legal advisor to the interim government, has come under heavy criticism over former President and Awami League political leader Abdul Hamid’s departure abroad. Allegations of falsehoods and aggressive propaganda against him have surfaced on social media.

In this context, Dr. Asif Nazrul clarified in a post on his verified Facebook page on Friday (May 9) that a murder case was filed against Abdul Hamid at Kishoreganj Sadar Police Station on January 14. The case also names former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, Sheikh Rehana, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Saima Wazed Putul, and Obaidul Quader.

Dr. Asif Nazrul emphasized that preventing Abdul Hamid, accused in a murder case, from traveling abroad is the responsibility of the police and intelligence agencies, which falls outside the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Law. He stated, “Judges under my ministry preside over lower courts. Their job is not to guard airports or restrict anyone’s movement.” However, this explanation has failed to quell the criticism. Many believe the government is silently using the law for its interests in this matter.

Meanwhile, questions have also arisen regarding the legal advisor’s role in banning the Awami League. Dr. Asif clarified that the provision for banning organizations under the ICT Act was included in his draft, and he personally presented it to the advisory council. He questioned, “How can I oppose my own draft?” He further stated that there is no disagreement in the advisory council over banning the Awami League, although there may be differing opinions on the procedure. He pointed out that the Awami League could also be banned through the Anti-Terrorism Act and other laws beyond the ICT Act.

Public concerns are mounting: is this a new form of abuse of power to suppress political opposition under the guise of law? The legal advisor’s statements have further complicated the debate. The matter of banning the Awami League now seems to rest on the judgment of the courts or the demands of political parties.